View source for R v Aspinall (Paul James) (1999) MHLR 12

''The failure to follow the requirements to have an appropriate adult in the interview of a mentally disordered suspect meant that, despite his apparent lucidity in interview, it was unfair to admit it in evidence.'' [MHLR.]

==MHLR==
{{MHLR|1999|12}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:[1999] MHLR 12}}

{{judgment available offline}}

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:1999 cases]]
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]]