View source for R v Ahmed (2012) EWCA Crim 99, (2012) MHLO 178

''(1) The appellant sought a [[s37/41]] restricted hospital order in place of an IPP sentence. (2) The Responsible Clinician argued for a [[s45A]] hybrid order, for reasons summarised by the court as follows: 'The appellant is an illegal immigrant. In order to be discharged from hospital he would have to undergo a period of controlled supervision. This would be in appropriate accommodation. Dr Swinton tells us that this is not an option open to an illegal immigrant like the appellant. Thus he cannot be discharged into the community because he cannot undertake the necessary conditioning which would satisfy the hospital that he was safe to be left in the community on his own. As a consequence he has to remain in hospital and he will take up a bed, apparently permanently. This is damaging to the wider public interest. If a section 45A order were made, then although the appellant would receive precisely the same treatment under a section 47 transfer as he currently does, a discharge can be effected by sending the appellant back to prison where the relevant supervision can be provided.' (3) The Court of Appeal admitted fresh evidence and, considering the appellant to be an ill man needing treatment rather than a criminal needing punishment, imposed a restricted hospital order.''

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2012) EWCA Crim 99}}

[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9883792/Hospital-beds-blocked-by-mentally-ill-migrant-criminals.html Wesley Johnson, 'Hospital beds blocked by mentally ill migrant criminals' (20/2/13)]

[http://mentalhealthcop.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/mentally-ill-migrant-criminals/ Mental Health Cop Blog, 'Mentally Ill Migrant Criminals' (21/2/13)]

[[Category:Sentence appeal cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]