View source for R (TF and Thompson) v SSHD (2009) EWCA Civ 792

''(1) The indefinite nature of the notification requirements of Part 2 of the [[Sexual Offences Act 2003]] (the Sex Offenders Register) is a disproportionate breach of Article 8: there is no opportunity for review of the necessity of the requirements, and the case is stronger in the case of young offenders. (2) The scheme where it related to foreign travel did not breach article 4 ("right of exit") of EC Council Directive 2004/38.''

==Related judgments==
[[R (F and Thompson) v SSHD (2010) UKSC 17]]
*[[R (TF and Thompson) v SSHD (2009) EWCA Civ 792]]
:*[[R (F and Thompson) v SSHD (2008) EWHC 3170 (QB)]]

==ICLR==
{{ICLR|R (TF and Thompson) v SSHD (2009) EWCA Civ 792}}

==External link==
{{#bailii: [2009] EWCA Civ 792}}

[http://www.lawreports.co.uk/HouseofLords/decisionresults09.htm ICLR website] - Permission to appeal given by Supreme Court on 7/12/09


[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]]