View source for R (SSHD) v MHRT, re Wilson (2004) EWHC 1029 (Admin)

''MHRT found that patient did not suffer from psychopathic disorder and directed absolute discharge; their decision was quashed because they had failed to consider conditional discharge criteria (i.e. whether patient should remain liable to be recalled for further treatment). Also: MHRT had no power to defer absolute discharge; had failed to explain why they rejected the RMO's evidence; and had misunderstood the legal definition of treatability.''

==External links==

{{#bailii:[2004] EWHC 1029 (Admin)}}



[[Category:Absolute or conditional discharge cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2004 cases]]