View source for R (SSHD) v MHRT, re BR (2005) EWHC 2468 (Admin)

''For restricted patients, Tribunals should consider appropriateness of liability to recall even if not satisfied that there is any detainable mental disorder.''

==Notes==
Tribunal absolutely discharged BR without considering appropriateness of liability to recall (i.e. conditional discharge).

Decision quashed, for the reason above, and case remitted to tribunal. (Unless there had been a deterioration, it was hoped that Home Secretary will conditionally discharge pending the next hearing.)

== External links ==

{{#bailii:[2005] EWHC 2468 (Admin)}}



[[Category:Absolute or conditional discharge cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2005 cases]]