View source for R (RJM) v SSWP (2007) EWCA Civ 614

"For the reasons I have given I would hold that the right to IS is a possession within A1P1 but that RJM's appeal must be dismissed because a person without accommodation does not have an "other status" within the meaning of Article 14 of the Convention. If, contrary to that view, RJM does have such a status, the refusal to pay DP to those who do not have accommodation is not unlawful under the Convention because the Secretary of State has justified their differential treatment. I would therefore dismiss the appeal."

==Related cases==
* [[R (RJM) v SSWP (2008) UKHL 63]]
:* [[R (RJM) v SSWP (2007) EWCA Civ 614]]

==External link==
{{#bailii: [2007] EWCA Civ 614}}


[[Category:Welfare benefits cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2007 cases]]