View source for R (P) v SSJ (2009) EWCA Civ 701

''The refusal of the SSJ to hold an inquiry into P's detention in YOI Feltham was lawful: (1) [[Article 2]] is only engaged where there is a "real and immediate" risk to life; the risk from P's self harming, while real, was not immediate. (2) There was no arguable breach of [[Article 3]] in the delay in transfer to hospital. Had there been an arguable Article 3 breach: in general, an inquiry would not have been mandatory; in this particular case, it would not have been necessary as the relevant facts were known.''

==ICLR==
{{ICLR|R (P) v SSJ (2009) EWCA Civ 701}}

==External link==
{{#bailii: [2009] EWCA Civ 701}}


[[Category:Inquest cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]