View source for R (Maguire) v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde (2020) EWCA Civ 738

{{Case
|Date=2020/06/10
|NCN=[2020] EWCA Civ 738
|ICLR=[2020] WLR(D) 333
|Other citations=[2020] Inquest LR 83, [2021] 2 All ER 93, [2020] Med LR 331, (2020) 176 BMLR 50, [2020] COPLR 654, [2021] QB 409, [2020] 3 WLR 1268
|Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
|Judges=Burnett, Ernest Ryder, Nicola Davies
|Parties=Muriel Maguire, HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde, United Response, Northwest Ambulance Service, Dr Surgaraz Adam, Dr Susan Fairhead, Blackpool City Council, Care Quality Commission, Kenneth Maguire
|Judicial history first case=R (Maguire) v HM's Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde (2019) EWHC 1232 (Admin)
|Sentence=Inquest and DOLS
|Summary="The issue for determination in this appeal is whether the circumstances surrounding the death of Jacqueline Maguire (known as Jackie) required the coroner to allow the jury at her inquest to return an expanded conclusion in accordance with section 5(2) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. ... Jackie was subject to a standard authorisation granted by Blackpool Council pursuant to the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards set out in Schedule A1 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. ... Jackie's circumstances were not analogous with a psychiatric patient who is in hospital to guard against the risk of suicide. She was accommodated by United Response to provide a home in which she could be looked after by carers, because she was unable to look after herself and it was not possible for her to live with her family. She was not there for medical treatment. If she needed medical treatment it was sought, in the usual way, from the NHS. Her position would not have been different had she been able to continue to live with her family with social services input and been subject to an authorisation from the Court of Protection in respect of her deprivation of liberty whilst in their care."
|Subject=Inquest cases
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2020/06/11 08:46:45 PM
}}