View source for R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (2004) EWHC 2193 (Admin)

''The Tribunal were right to conclude that the conditions which the claimant patient contended for (continued residence at Thornford Park) would be a deprivation, rather than a restriction, of his liberty. The patient's consent to this continuing deprivation of liberty would not confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal.'''

== External link ==
{{#bailii:(2004) EWHC 2193 (Admin)}}

[[Category:Discharge conditions cases]]
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2004 cases]]