View source for R (F and Thompson) v SSHD (2008) EWHC 3170 (QB)

''The indefinite nature of the notification requirements of Part 2 of the [[Sexual Offences Act 2003]] (the Sex Offenders Register) is a disproportionate breach of [[Article 8]]: there is no opportunity for review in the case of young offenders; there is no entitlement to have determined the question of whether the notification requirement continues to serve a legitimate purpose.''

==Related judgments==
[[R (F and Thompson) v SSHD (2010) UKSC 17]]
*[[R (TF and Thompson) v SSHD (2009) EWCA Civ 792]]
:*[[R (F and Thompson) v SSHD (2008) EWHC 3170 (QB)]]

==Other==
Hearing date 19/11/2008, Judgment 19/12/2008

LORD JUSTICE LATHAM, Mr Justice Underhill, Mr Justice Flaux

Hugh Southey (instructed by Stephensons solicitors) for F

Pete Weatherby (instructed by Irwin Mitchell solicitors) for Angus Thompson

Steven Kovats (instructed by Treasury solicitors) for the Secretary of State for Justice

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2008] EWHC 3170 (QB)}}


[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2008 cases]]
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]]