View source for R (Donaldson) v SSHD (2006) EWHC 1107 (Admin)

''The Home Office decision to cease considering patients for [[technical lifer]] status (unless in exceptional circumstances) was lawful: (1) It was too early to say whether the Home Office's acceptance that there could be "exceptional cases" was meaningless and that the policy was therefore an unlawful fetter on the discretion as to route to discharge; (2) There was no substantive legitimate expectation that the policy would not be changed, that it would be kept open for them, or a legitimate expectation that more would be done in relation to the notification about the change in policy''

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2006] EWHC 1107 (Admin)}}


[[Category:Ministry of Justice cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2006 cases]]