View source for R (Chatting) v Viridian Housing (2012) EWHC 3595 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 177

"This litigation arises out of what may be loosely called the reorganisation by Viridian Housing, the charity which owns the premises, of the arrangements for the provision of care to residents of the building in which Miss Chatting lives. ... On behalf of Viridian Housing, Mr Christopher Baker urged upon me that the relief sought against his client – namely, declarations that in transferring responsibility for Miss Chatting's care to another organisation Viridian were in breach of a compromise agreement made in earlier litigation and had infringed article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – was academic and should not in any event be granted. On behalf of Miss Chatting Mr Stephen Cragg pursued claims for those declarations, as well as a declaration that Wandsworth Borough Council had acted unlawfully in its management of the transfer of Miss Chatting's care, in that it had failed to ensure that care was provided to her in a way that meets her assessed needs and takes into account her best interests. At the hearing Mr Cragg focussed his case against Wandsworth as being that it had failed to act in Miss Chatting's best interests as required by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. For the Borough Council, Ms Elisabeth Laing QC resisted Mr Cragg's claim and also sought a ruling on two further issues of interpretation of the compromise agreement."

==External links==
{{#bailii:(2012) EWHC 3595 (Admin)}}

[http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?id=14358 Jonathan Auburn and Benjamin Tankel, 'Private care homes and the Human Rights Act' (30/5/13)]

[[Category:Community care]]
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]