View source for RC v CC (2013) EWHC 1424 (COP), (2013) MHLO 68

"The main application before the court is in fact not by CC but by her birth Mother RC. There was indirect contact between CC and RC until 2010/11 at a rate of 6 or 12 monthly letters, drawings, photographs and cards organised by the adoption agency [Birmingham City Council] through the adoptive Mother. That indirect contact stopped when the adoptive parents separated. By her application dated 2nd October 2012 to the Court of Protection RC applies to reintroduce such indirect contact. I suspect [but have not been formally told] that she would of course like direct contact in due course were it feasible. The case is highly unusual in that ordinarily a birth parent cannot by application to a court reintroduce herself to a birth child after adoption. It is only CC's incapacity that enables an application to be made."

==Related judgments==
[[RC v CC (2014) EWHC 131 (COP), (2014) MHLO 7]]
*[[RC v CC (2013) EWHC 1424 (COP), (2013) MHLO 68]]

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2013) EWHC 1424 (COP)}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]