View source for Practice Guidance: Committal for Contempt of Court (2013) EWHC B4 (COP)

{{Case
|Date=2013/03/03
|NCN=[2013] EWCOP B4
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Judge, Munby
|Sentence=Contempt guidance
|Summary=Applications for committal for contempt, including in the Court of Protection and Family Division, should be heard and decided in public. The discretion to hear such an application in private (in the COP or, in proceedings relating to a child, the Family Division) should be exercised only in exceptional cases where it is necessary in the interests of justice, and in all such cases the court must state in public: (a) the name of that person; (b) in general terms the nature of the contempt of court in respect of which the committal order or suspended committal order is being made; and (c) the punishment being imposed. Committal applications should at the outset be listed and heard in public and a public judgment must be given setting out reasons if the court decides to sit in private. Committal applications in the Court of Protection or the Family Division should at the outset be listed and heard in public. Whenever the court decides to exercise its discretion to sit in private the judge should, before continuing the hearing in private, give a judgment in public setting out the reasons for doing so. Every such statement or judgment must be transcribed at public expense and published on Bailii.
|Detail===See also==
[[Practice Guidance: Committal for Contempt of Court (Supplemental) (2013) EWHC B7 (COP)]]

[[Stoke City Council v Maddocks (2012) EWHC B31 (COP), (2012) MHLO 111]]

==Text==
{{transcript}}
|Subject=Contempt of court cases
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2021/04/09 08:44:45 PM
}}