View source for Pender v DPP (2013) EWHC 2598 (Admin)

''An ASBO was imposed with a 'no begging' condition. A Crown Court appeal, based on uncontradicted medical evidence (that the appellant suffered learning difficulties, schizophrenia and severe nicotine addiction, and that begging was the manifestation of nicotine addiction), was unsuccessful. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal by way of case stated, because the judge had failed to set out the factual basis for her factual conclusion (which was contrary to the medical evidence) that the appellant had been capable of complying with the ASBO.''

==Judgment (Crown Copyright)==
{{text|(2013) EWHC 2598 (Admin)}}

==Citations==
(2013) 177 CL&J 78, [2013] All ER (D) 173 (Jan)

Was on MHLO as [2013] MHLO 12 (QBD) before NCN known

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2013) EWHC 2598 (Admin)}}

[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
[[Category:Criminal law capacity cases‎]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]