View source for Panteleyenko v Ukraine 11901/02 (2006) ECHR 667

''A search of the applicant's office, and the disclosure of confidential psychiatric information, was not in accordance with domestic law and therefore violated [[Article 8]]; the domestic authorities' refusal to pay compensation on the ground that criminal proceedings had been discontinued on "non-exonerating grounds" contravened the presumption of innocence and violated [[Article 6]](2).''

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2006] ECHR 667}}


[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2006 cases]]