View source for PQR v Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2023) UKUT 195 (AAC)

{{Case
|Date=2023-08-11
|NCN=[2023] UKUT 195 (AAC)
|ICLR=[2024] WLR(D) 8
|ICLR ID=2024000007
|Court=Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
|Judges=Jacobs
|Parties=PQR, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
|Judicial history=*[[Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v SSHSC (2023) EWHC 3182 (Admin)]] (High Court proceedings)
*[[PQR v Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2023) UKUT 195 (AAC)]] (Upper Tribunal proceedings)
|Sentence=Tribunal and validity
|Summary=The medical examination for a CTO renewal in 2020 had been conducted remotely, though renewals in 2021 and 2022 were conducted in person. The tribunal decided that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the validity of the CTO. The Upper Tribunal proceeded on the assumption (which the High Court subsequently confirmed) that the 2020 examination did not comply with the [[s20A]] requirements. It decided that: (1) the logical approach, being that the CTO had not been extended in 2020, would be self-defeating as it would remove the tribunal's power to deal with an application at all; (2) the pragmatic approach, which the judge preferred, was that the renewal had legal effect unless and until it was set aside in some lawful manner, but the tribunal still had no power to deal with issues of validity; (3) in any event, even if the tribunal had that power, (a) there would be no need to exercise the discretion to discharge, as deciding that the extension was invalid would mean that the CTO had already ended, and (b) taking into account the relevant factors (which are that such case involve the liberty of the subject, the health and safety of the patient, and the protection of others) it would have been perverse for the tribunal to have exercised its discretion to discharge the patient.
|Detail===Judicial summary from Gov.uk==
<div class="perm">
The First-tier Tribunal has no jurisdiction to rule of the validity of a community treatment order or the extension of the period for which the order is in force.
</div>
|External links=*[https://www.gov.uk/administrative-appeals-tribunal-decisions/pqr-v-derbyshire-healthcare-nhs-foundation-trust-2023-ukut-195-aac Gov.uk: transcript and judicial summary]
|Subject=Powers,Upper Tribunal decisions
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2024-10-21 09:28:17 AM
}}