View source for North Somerset Council v LW (2014) EWCOP 3, (2014) MHLO 39

"At the conclusion of the hearing on 23 April an issue about costs arose. ... I am in no doubt that, on the evidence before me, UHBT fell well short in meeting their duties to LW and her unborn child. ... The cumulative effect of these factors is that part of the hearing on 15 April and the whole of the hearing on 16 April, were completely ineffective. Accordingly I am satisfied that in the premises the court is justified in departing from the general rule that there be no order as to costs: rr 157 & 159. ... Accordingly I propose to order that UHBT pay the whole of the Official Solicitor's costs of 15 and 16 April. In contrast the hearing of 23 April was an effective hearing albeit I ultimately made no order on the full evidence then before the court. Thus the usual rule will apply in respect of the hearing on 23 April, namely UHBT will pay one half of the Official Solicitor's costs for that hearing. Those costs are to be assessed, if not agreed, on a standard basis. In respect of the costs of the local authority, on the basis that it applied for and was granted orders under the inherent jurisdiction and a RRO on the morning of 15 April. I shall direct that UHBT pay one half of the local authority's costs of the hearing on 15 April and the whole of its costs for the hearing on 16 April. For the reason given in paragraph 43 above, I make no order for costs for the hearing on 23 April."

==Related judgments==
[[North Somerset Council v LW (2014) EWCOP 3, (2014) MHLO 39]]
*[[North Somerset Council v LW (2014) EWHC 1670 (Fam), (2014) MHLO 38]]

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWCOP 3}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]