View source for Milton Keynes Council v RR (2014) EWCOP 34, (2014) MHLO 120

"MKC had set a juggernaut in motion by their initial failure to investigate the safeguarding alerts and their decision to remove P from her home in circumstances which were unlawful. This case concerned the very sad and tragic consequences for P which flowed from that decision. I have no difficulty in concluding that MKC’s practice in this case was substandard. It is P’s misfortune to have been the victim of that substandard practice. MKC’s acts and omissions have detrimentally affected both P and her family and changed the course of their lives. In my judgment an award of costs is manifestly justified. I have considered whether a partial costs order is appropriate but have come to the conclusion that this is an exceptional case in which a full costs order is justified. Accordingly the Applicant shall pay the 2nd respondent’s costs of the proceedings to date to be subject to detailed assessment unless agreed between the parties. The costs order shall include a detailed assessment of any publicly funded costs of the 2nd Respondent."

==Related judgments==
{{related judgments|Milton Keynes Council v RR (2014) EWCOP B19, (2014) MHLO 30}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWCOP 34}}

[[Category:COP costs cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]