View source for MM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD (2012) EWCA Civ 279, (2012) MHLO 38

Immigration case. "In my view, the Upper Tribunal was diverted, by reason of the arguments advanced, from an important aspect of the case, namely, whether it was disproportionate to deport the appellant on the grounds of his previous convictions in the light of the evidence of the prognosis and the relationship between his mental illness and his offending. The judge never seems to have reached any clear conclusion based on an assessment of the risk of re-offending despite continued medication and support from his family here. If the correct view is that there is no realistic risk of further offending and the prognosis is excellent then it is difficult to see how it could be proportionate to deport this appellant. He has been in this country for 12 years and he has nothing to go back to save his grandmother and great-aunt, if they are still alive."

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2012) EWCA Civ 279}}

[[Category:Repatriation cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]