View source for LV v UK 50718/16 (2018) MHLO 22

{{Case
|Date=2018/03/12
|Other citations=[2018] MHLO 22
|Court=European Court of Human Rights
|Parties=LV, United Kingdom
|Judicial history first case=R (LV) v SSJ (2012) EWHC 3899 (Admin)
|Sentence=MHT/Parole Board delay
|Summary="Complaint: The applicant complains under [[Article 5]](4) of the Convention that she did not have a speedy review of the legality of her detention. In particular, she contends that her right to a speedy review was violated both by delays on the part of the Public Protection Casework Section and the Parole Board, and from the unnecessary two-stage Tribunal/Parole Board process. Question to the Parties: Was the review of the applicant’s detention which commenced on 24 May 2011 and concluded on 21 March 2013 conducted 'speedily' within the meaning of Article 5(4) of the Convention?" (The first paragraph of the decision is wrong as the applicant's solicitor works for Campbell Law Solicitors.)
|External links=[https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182191 HUDOC] (full text)
|Subject=ECHR deprivation of liberty cases, Prison law cases
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2019/03/23 12:15:12 PM
}}
[[Category:Judgment available offline]]