View source for LB Tower Hamlets v TB (2014) EWCOP 53, (2014) MHLO 130

"All parties are agreed that TB lacks capacity to make decisions concerning her residence, her care and her contact with SA. The issues that I have to decide are these: (i) Where should TB live in her best interests? ... (ii) If TB does not return to 9 Emerald Mansions what should her contact be with SA, in her best interests? (iii) Does SA have the capacity to consent to sex? This is an abstract question if she does not return to 9 Emerald Mansions, but a very real one if she does. (iv) Whatever I decide about residence does her care regime amount to a deprivation of liberty within the terms of [[Article 5]]?"

==External links==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWCOP 53}}

{{link|http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11299532/Man-banned-from-having-sex-with-wife-by-High-Court-judge.html|Daily Telegraph, 'Man banned from having sex with wife by High Court judge' (17/12/14)|s}}. Subtitle: "Bangladeshi man claims he has right under his culture to have sex with wife, who has mental age of a child, whenever he pleases and she has no right to refuse".

[[Category:Best interests]]
[[Category:Sex and marriage cases]]
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]