View source for John Blavo v Law Society (2017) EWHC 561 (Ch)

{{Case
|Date=2017/03/29
|NCN=[2017] EWHC 561 (Ch)
|ICLR=[2017] WLR(D) 254
|Court=High Court (Chancery Division)
|Judges=Klein
|Parties=John Blavo, Law Society
|Judicial history first case=Blavo and Co Solicitors (SRA decision: closure) (2015) MHLO 70
|Sentence=Statutory demands set aside
|Summary="In November 2015 the Law Society served a statutory demand on Mr Blavo claiming that he owed it £151,816.27. In February 2016 the Law Society served a second statutory demand on Mr Blavo claiming that he owed it a further £643,489.20. On 14 December 2015 Mr Blavo applied to set aside the first statutory demand. On 11 March 2016 Mr Blavo applied to set aside the second statutory demand. ... It is the costs of the intervention, from 15 October 2015 to 20 January 2016, into the company and Mr Blavo's practice which are the underlying subject matter of the statutory demands. ... It follows from all I have said that I have concluded that the statutory demands in this case should be set aside because the debts in question are not for liquidated sums."
|Subject=SRA decisions
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2019/02/04 09:56:25 PM
}}