View source for JP v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2012) UKUT 486 (AAC)

"The grounds of appeal related to the Tribunal’s finding that he suffered from a mental disorder; the insufficiency of the Tribunal’s reasons for their decision that the appellant was to continue to be detained under section 2, and to his view that there had been a breach of his right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.  He made seven specific submissions on this which I shall address hereafter.  At the hearing the appellant also raised a breach of Article 9 of the Convention – his right to freedom of thought, and submitted that the Mental Health Act 1983 was flawed."

==External links==
{{#bailii:(2012) UKUT 486 (AAC)|no}}

[[:File:JP v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2012) UKUT 486 (AAC), (2012) MHLO 172.pdf|Tribunals website - transcript]]

[2012] MHLO 172

[[Category:Upper Tribunal decisions]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]