View source for Harrow CCG v IPJ (2018) EWCOP 44

{{Case
|Date=2019/04/30
|NCN=[2018] EWCOP 44
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Hilder
|Parties=Harrow Clinical Commissioning Group, IPJ, IJJ, AJ
|Sentence=Residence and care
|Summary="The Court is asked to determine where AJ should live and how he should be cared for. The applicant CCG has proposed an extensive package of care at the family home, with (most of) the financial arrangements managed by a third party broker. JA's parents, who are the Second and Third Respondents, do not agree the proposals and seek the dismissal of the application.
|Detail===Thanks==
{{thanks|Whitaker, Will|Bindmans}}
|Subject=Best interests
|Judgment=(2018) EWCOP 44.pdf
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2019/05/10 09:15:02 PM
}}