View source for FS v RS and JS (2020) EWFC 63

{{Case
|Date=2020/09/30
|NCN=[2020] EWFC 63
|ICLR=[2020] WLR(D) 532
|ICLR ID=2020006531
|Other citations=[2021] 2 FLR 641, [2021] 4 All ER 245, [2020] 4 WLR 139, [2021] 2 FCR 28
|Court=Family Court
|Judges=Munby
|Parties=FS, RS, JS, Faiz Siddiqui, Javed Siddiqui, Rakshanda Siddiqui
|Judicial history=*[[Siddiqui v Siddiqui & Anor (2021) EWCA Civ 1572]]
*[[FS v RS and JS (2020) EWFC 63]]
|Sentence=Inherent jurisdiction and money
|Summary=The 41-year-old applicant sought financial relief against his parents (who had reduced their financial support) pursuant to s27 [[Matrimonial Causes Act 1973]], sch 1 [[Children Act 1989]] and "that branch of the recently rediscovered inherent jurisdiction which applies in relation to adults who, though not lacking capacity, are 'vulnerable'". His argument on the inherent jurisdiction failed: (a) his claim lay far outside its accepted parameters; (b) it cannot be used to compel an unwilling third party to provide money or services; (c) it is ousted by any relevant statutory scheme.
|Subject=Inherent jurisdiction cases
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2021/09/20 09:39:27 AM
}}