View source for Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Mailley (2023) EWCA Civ 1246

{{Case
|Date=2023-10-27
|NCN=[2023] EWCA Civ 1246
|ICLR=[2023] WLR(D) 443
|ICLR ID=2022010246
|Essex issue=135B
|Essex page=29
|Other citations=[2024] HLR 4, [2024] 1 WLR 1837, [2024] WLR 1837
|Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
|Judges=Baker, Simler, Elisabeth Laing
|Parties=Dudley Metropolitan Council, Marilyn Mailley
|Judicial history first case=Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Mailley (2022) EWHC 2328 (QB)
|Sentence=Capacity and Article 14 other status
|Summary=This housing law case considered capacity and "other status" in an [[Article 14]] discrimination claim.
|External links=*{{link
|text=Eloise Marriott, 'Arguing Incompatibility: Lessons from the Court of Appeal' (St Philips Barristers, 19/8/24)
|url=https://st-philips.com/news-events/arguing-incompatibility-what-can-be-learnt-from-dudley-metropolitan-borough-council-v-mailley-2023-ewca-civ-1246/
|archive=https://web.archive.org/web/20240902142220/https://st-philips.com/news-events/arguing-incompatibility-what-can-be-learnt-from-dudley-metropolitan-borough-council-v-mailley-2023-ewca-civ-1246/
}}. This summarises the judgment and mentions that the appellant had recently made an application to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal.
|Subject=Miscellaneous cases
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2024-09-02 02:08:56 PM
}}