View source for DP v South Tyneside DC (2011) Admin Court 14/7/11

''It was not practicable to consult the nearest relative because (1) DP was perceived to be potentially at risk from him (forced marriage/death) and (2) consultation was not possible without disclosing DP's location (the duty of consultation not being one of mere notification): therefore the application for habeas corpus was refused.''

==Other==
Hearing: 14/7/11

Before: Mitting J

Bridget Dolan (instructed by Hadaway & Hadaway) for the applicant

John O'Sullivan (instructed by In-house solicitor) for the first respondent

Vikram Sachdeva (instructed by Beachcroft) for the second defendant

==Citations==
DP v (1) South Tyneside District Council (2) Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

LTL 15/7/2011 EXTEMPORE

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

No transcript available at time of writing (extempore judgment)

Summary available on Lawtel

[[Category:Consulting NR]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available offline]]