View source for CS v SBH (2019) EWHC 634 (Fam)

{{Case
|Date=2019/03/18
|NCN=[2019] EWHC 634 (Fam)
|ICLR=[2019] WLR(D) 216
|Court=High Court (Family Division)
|Judges=Williams
|Parties=CS, SBH, FS, Andreea Juravle
|Sentence=Whether child had "sufficient understanding" to conduct appeal without Guardian
|Summary="Thus in determining whether the child has sufficient understanding to give instructions to pursue an appeal and to conduct the appeal I need to consider a range of factors including: (i) The level of intelligence of the child. (ii) The emotional maturity of the child. (iii) Factors which might undermine their understanding such as issues arising from their emotional, psychological, psychiatric or emotional state. (iv) Their reasons for wishing to instruct a solicitor directly or to act without a guardian and the strength of feeling accompanying the wish to play a direct role. (v) Their understanding of the issues in the case and their desired outcome any matter which sheds light on the extent to which those are authentically their own or are mere parroting of one parents position. ... (vi) Their understanding of the process of litigation including the function of their lawyer, the role of the judge, the role they might play and the law that is applied and some of the consequences of involvement in litigation. ... (vii) The court's assessment of the risk of harm to the child of direct participation for the risk of harm arising from excluding the child from direct participation and the child's appreciation of the risks of harm."
|Subject=Litigation capacity cases
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2019/03/19 09:56:08 PM
}}