View source for Barber v LB Croydon (2010) EWCA Civ 51

''(1) The council's decision to seek an immediate order for possession, following an assault which was almost certainly linked with the claimant's  learning difficulties and a personality disorder, without applying the Council's policy on vulnerable people, was Wednesbury unreasonable. (2) The DDA aspect of the appeal was unsuccessful: the question was not whether he was treated less favourably than a person without his disabilities but whether he should have been treated differently precisely because he has such disabilities and because they were a significant contributory factor to his behaviour that day.''

==External link==
{{#bailii: [2010] EWCA Civ 51}}


[[Category:Disability discrimination]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]