View source for A Council v X (2011) EWHC B10 (COP)

''Direct contact between X, a 94 year old lady who lacked capacity due to advanced dementia, and her daughter Y was no longer in X's best interests.''

==Related judgments==
[[A Council v X (2011) EWHC B10 (COP)]]
*[[HBCC v LG (2010) EWHC 1527 (Fam)]]

==Other==
Date: 9/11/10

Before: King J

Mr Joseph O'Brien (instructed by The Council's Legal Dept) for the Applicant.

Ms Amy Street (instructed by Langleys Solicitors, acting for the Official Solicitor) for the First Respondent.

Y appeared in person.

Z did not attend court 

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2010) EWHC B10 (COP)}}

[[Media:(2011) EWHC B10 (COP).pdf|Transcript]]<!--PDf of BAILII's RTF?-->

{{link|https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/adult-social-care/467-adult-social-services-old-articles/7520-prohibition-era|Alex Ruck Keene and Victoria Butler-Cole, 'Strained relations' (Local Government Lawyer, 4/8/11)|s}}

[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
[[Category:Best interests]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]