View source for AP v Tameside MBC (2017) EWHC 65 (QB)

{{Case
|Date=2017/01/20
|NCN=[2017] EWHC 65 (QB)
|ICLR=[2017] WLR(D) 74
|ICLR ID=2016008820
|Other citations=[2017] WLR 2127, [2017] 1 WLR 2127, (2017) 20 CCL Rep 5, [2017] MHLO 4
|Court=High Court (Queen's Bench Division)
|Judges=King
|Parties=AP, Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
|Sentence=HRA time limit
|Summary="The essence of the claim under Article 5 is that the Claimant was unlawfully deprived of his liberty between the 1st of February 2011 and the 12th of August 2013, a period of some two and a half years. ... In the present case the extension period sought (18 months) represents an extension equal to the whole of the primary limitation period (12 months) and half as much again. ... For all these reasons I decline to grant the Claimant an extension of time under section 7 to bring his human rights claim against the Defendant."
|External links=*{{link|https://courtofprotectionhandbook.com/2017/01/24/hra-time-limits-alert/|Sophy Miles, 'HRA Time Limits Alert' (COP Handbook blog, 24/1/17)|s}}
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty,Unlawful detention cases,Miscellaneous cases
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2021/09/14 03:42:51 PM
}}