Rutten v The Netherlands 32605/96 [2001] ECHR 482
The decision to renew the patient's confinement order was taken after the order had expired, but under domestic law there was nothing requiring release in these circumstances; under Convention law the detention was not arbitrary, being based on a court order and expert evidence, so there was no violation of Article 5(1); however, the lawfulness of detention was not decided speedily, so there was a violation of Article 4(4); this finding constituted just satisfaction.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: