Re AA (Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: No best interests decision) [2024] EWCOP 39 (T3)
Death The court application was left so late that there was only one "option" left which the clinicians were willing to accept (palliative care in the hospital) so the judge refused to make a best interests decision. The trust instead sought a declaration under the inherent jurisdiction, it seemed to the judge only to provide legal top cover as the treatment would be the same regardless of the court's decision, so the judge refused to make that order either.
Essex
This case has been summarised on page 30 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 143, September 2024).Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
- Medical treatment cases🔍
Date: 17/6/24🔍
Court: Court of Protection🔍
Judicial history:
Judge(s):
- Henke🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 143, September 2024)
- Re AA (Costs) [2024] EWCOP 44 (T3)
Published: 14/10/24 13:17
Cached: 2024-12-19 09:47:56
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: