R v Nelson [2022] EWHC 2928 (SCCO)
Costs The barrister appealed the determining officer's decision on his fees for a complex mental health criminal appeal. He had claimed £4,350 for c.20 hours work prior to the leave to appeal hearing and £7,500 for a subsequent 32 hours' work. The determining officer had only allowed an attendance-only fee of £150 for the hearing, and a brief fee of £4,000 for the subsequent work. The costs judge disagreed with the determining officer's interpretation and application of the court orders, partly because it was contrary to the provisions of the 2013 Regulations and partly because it is consistent with established principles of interpretation, and allowed him £3,250 and £6,000 respectively. (The barrister had already lost money on his 43-page Advice and Grounds when his instructing solicitors became insolvent.)
Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
- Miscellaneous cases🔍
Date: 15/11/22🔍
Court: Senior Courts Cost Office🔍
Judicial history:
- R v Nelson [2022] EWHC 2928 (SCCO) (costs)
- R v Nelson [2020] EWCA Crim 1615 (the appeal)
Judge(s):
- Leonard🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:Published: 4/12/22 12:26
Cached: 2024-11-21 16:28:15
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: