Holly.gif
Open justice | Let us know if you have a tribunal decision you would like to publish (see Re A)
Email updates | CPD scheme

Online forum | Latest topic on forum: NR rights after patient released to care | News

North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust v KAG [2024] EWCOP 38 (T3)

Treatment under s63 The Trusts sought s15 MCA 2005 declarations that: (1) it is in the best interests of KAG to undergo urgent placement of a percutaneous gastrostomy tube ('PEG'); (2) the proposed PEG procedure could lawfully be undertaken pursuant to powers under s63 MHA 1983; (3) KAG is ineligible to be deprived of her liberty under Sched 1A MCA.

Essex

Essex newsletter 143.pdf
This case has been summarised on page 39 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 143, September 2024).

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

  • Medical treatment cases🔍
  • Challenges to compulsory treatment🔍

Date: 12/7/24🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

  • Victoria Butler-Cole🔍

Parties:

  • North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust🔍
  • Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust🔍
  • KAG🔍
  • Mr G🔍
  • Stockton on Tees Borough Council🔍

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 21/10/24 11:35

Cached: 2024-12-25 14:19:35

Retrieved from "https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=North_Tees_and_Hartlepool_NHS_Foundation_Trust_v_KAG_(2024)_EWCOP_38_(T3)&oldid=64151"