Milton Keynes CCG (17 018 823e) [2019] MHLO 61 (LGSCO)
Section 117 complaint "Whilst the Trust was acting on behalf of the CCG in carrying out the s117 actions, the CCG is ultimately responsible for s.117 provision, along with the Council. ... The CCG, Trust and the Council should, by 23 December: (a) Write to Mrs B apologising for the impact of the fault in relation to not refunding the care fees relating to the supported living placement. (b) Confirm with Mrs B and refund the supported living fees which have not already been reimbursed. Mrs B may need to provide additional information to the organisations about fees paid as part of this. (c) Write to Miss A and Mrs B personally and apologise for the impact the lack of s.117 planning had on both of them individually due to the length of time Miss A went without adequate support. They should also apologise for the uncertainty caused by not knowing whether the incidents outlined above could have been avoided. (d) Pay Miss A £1500 and Mrs B £1000 each in recognition of the impact of the and length of time Miss A had a lack of s.117 support. By 20 February 2020, the Council, CCG and Trust should create an action plan of how they will notify and cooperate with each other to ensure patients are assessed promptly and s.117 care put in place in line with the MHA Code of Practice. This action plan should include a review of progress and the impact of any changes following implementation of the plan."
Full judgment: No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)
Subject(s):
Date: 26/11/19🔍
Court: Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:
- No pages link to this page
Published: 4/3/20 21:52
Cached: 2024-12-31 04:20:54
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: