JB v Elysium Healthcare [2025] UKUT 9 (AAC)
Mistake of fact - availability of treatment Audio recordings made by the patient immediately after the tribunal showed that the RC had lied about intending to resume psychological therapy. On the basis of those recordings, the UT set aside its original refusal to grant permission to appeal, and now decided that the tribunal had been labouring under a mistake of fact amounting to an error of law. It was not clear what the decision would otherwise have been (the tribunal referred to other treatment but attached particular importance to psychology) so the error was not immaterial. The case was remitted for re-hearing by a new tribunal. The UT noted, from previous authority, that: (1) appropriate medical treatment cannot be said to be "available" to a patient if the detaining authority is unwilling to provide it; (2) to establish a mistake of fact amounting to an error of law: (a) the mistake must be on an existing fact (including mistake as to the availability of evidence on a particular matter); (b) the fact must be uncontentious; (c) the party asserting the error of law must not be responsible for the mistake; and (d) the mistake must have played a material part in the tribunal’s reasoning.
Judicial summary from Gov.uk
This appeal is about the situation in which a tribunal reaches its decision based on a mistake of fact, and about whether medical treatment which is considered to be appropriate for a patient can properly be said to be “available” to him if the hospital in which he is detained has the resources to provide it but is not willing to do so.
External links
Full judgment: BAILII
Download here
Subject(s):
Date: 9/1/25🔍
Court: Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)🔍
Judge(s):
- Thomas Church🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- No pages link to this page
Published: 21/1/25 23:41
Cached: 2025-01-22 18:05:42
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: