Hughes v Pritchard [2021] EWHC 1580 (Ch)

Testamentary capacity "Gwen Hughes, the second defendant, and her son Stephen Hughes, the third defendant, contend that the 2016 will is invalid on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, want of knowledge and approval and/or undue influence exerted by Gareth Hughes upon his father; or alternatively that Yr Efail is subject to a proprietary estoppel claim by Elfed’ Hughes’ estate whereby Yr Efail belongs in equity to that estate."

Essex

This case has been summarised on page 27 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 115, September 2021).

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

• 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 121, April 2022)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

• Testamentary capacity cases🔍 Other related cases can be found in Category:Capacity and DOL‎

Date: 11/6/21🔍

Court: High Court (Chancery Division)🔍

Judicial history:

• Hughes v Pritchard [2021] EWHC 1580 (Ch)
• Hughes v Pritchard [2022] EWCA Civ 386

Judge(s):

• Jarman🔍

Parties:

• Gareth Hughes🔍
• Carys Pritchard🔍
• Gwen Hughes🔍
• Stephen Hughes🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2021] EWHC 1580 (Ch)^B

What links here:

• 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 115, September 2021)
• 39 Essex Chambers, 'MCA update - all the capacity news that’s fit to print for July 2021' (23/7/21)
• Hughes v Pritchard [2022] EWCA Civ 386

Published: 16/7/22 10:24

Cached: 2024-12-18 02:13:35