Dr A Malik v Cygnet Behavioural Health Ltd (reconsideration) [2021] MHLO 7 (ET)
Unfair dismissal and whistleblowing The claimant sought reconsideration as the original decision contained no specific decision in relation to one of the argued detriments, part 1 of which was her suspension in relation to administration of covert medication, and part 2 of which was the inadequate appeal against dismissal. Part 1 was presented out of time but part 2 was presented in time. The tribunal rejected the respondent's argument that its Article 6 rights would be breached by a finding being made months after the trial, but went on to decide that the appeal was part of the dismissal so was excluded as a detriment and, an any event, was not motivated by the public interest disclosures.
Full judgment: No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)
Download here
Subject(s):
- Miscellaneous cases🔍
Date: 6/1/22🔍
Court: Employment Tribunal🔍
Judicial history:
Judge(s):
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:
- Dr A Malik v CAS (Cygnet) Behavioural Health Ltd [2021] UKET 2403141/2018
- Ambreen Malik [2021] MHLO 8 (MPT)
Published: 2/12/24 22:08
Cached: 2024-12-19 04:01:00
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: