View source for North Somerset Council v LW (2014) EWHC 1670 (Fam), (2014) MHLO 38

"In those circumstances I am satisfied that if the mother were to learn of the plan to remove her child at birth there is a very real risk she would harm herself and a very very real risk that she would cause physical harm to her baby. ... On the exceptional facts of this case I was wholly satisfied that the balance fell decisively in favour of making the [Reporting Restrictions Order]. It was the only proportionate course to be taken to secure the safety of the mother and of the child. ... At the hearing on 6 May it was agreed by all parties that the RRO had served its time limited purpose. I, therefore, discharged the order. ... I am in no doubt that the only order I can make in EW's welfare best interests is an interim care order."

==Related judgments==
[[North Somerset Council v LW (2014) EWCOP 3, (2014) MHLO 39]]
*[[North Somerset Council v LW (2014) EWHC 1670 (Fam), (2014) MHLO 38]]

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWHC 1670 (Fam)}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]