View source for BB v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2009) UKUT 157 (AAC)

''(1) The Tribunal panel failed to state with clarity how and why it disagreed with the reasoning of the independent psychiatrist who had recommended conditional discharge; therefore, the making of the decision involved the making of an error on a point of law. (2) The decision was not set aside: to do so would provide no practical benefit as the patient had recently re-applied to the Tribunal.''

==Other==
Hearing: 5 August 2009

Decision: 7 August 2009

Before: Mr Justice Walker CP, Upper Tribunal Judge Levenson and Upper Tribunal Judge Jacobs

Stephen Simblet (instructed by Wolton & Co) for the Appellant

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2009] UKUT 157 (AAC)}}


[[Category:Reasons]]
[[Category:Upper Tribunal decisions]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]