View source for A Healthcare NHS Trust v P and Q (2015) EWCOP 15, (2015) MHLO 23

"The Trust ... applied to the Court for a declaration in P's best interests firstly, not to escalate his care and secondly to discontinue some care, inevitably leading to his demise. ... At the same time they also applied for a reporting restriction order with accompanying documentation. When they sought to serve that material on the Press Association through the service known as CopyDirect, but now in fact called the Injunctions Alert Service, the second respondent objected to the disclosure of any identity either of P or of P's family. ... As a result I listed a hearing ... for the Court to consider four questions: (Generally) (1) Whether in applications for reporting restrictions orders the applicant, when notifying the Press of the application, is required to identify the parties and or P. (Specifically in this application) (2) Whether further hearings in these proceedings should be heard in public. (3) Whether there should be any reporting restrictions in relation to these proceedings and if so those restrictions. (4) Such further directions as seemed appropriate to the Court."

==Related judgments==
*[[St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v P and Q (2015) EWCOP 42, (2015) MHLO 115]]
*[[A Healthcare NHS Trust v P and Q (2015) EWCOP 15, (2015) MHLO 23]]
==External link==
{{#bailii:(2015) EWCOP 15}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2015 cases]]