Digitalpoppy.jpg
Solicitors: The CPD scheme is up to date with questions from the past year - 12 hours for £60. You could do all 12 hours in this CPD year, or save some until next year.
Everyone: An online forum is now available: visit the forum to see how it works and get involved.

Richards v Worcestershire County Council [2016] EWHC 1954 (Ch)

After-care "The present proceedings were issued on 6 March 2015. They seek to recover sums totalling £644,645.87, which, it is said, were spent by Mr Richards' deputy on his behalf on providing him with care. The claim is based on section 117 of the 1983 Act. It is Mr Richards' case that section 117 applied when he was released from hospital in 2004 and that, accordingly, the defendants had a duty to provide him with after-care services. He contends that that duty extended to the provision of the various services which have thus far been paid for privately. ... There are essentially two issues to consider: (i) Is it in principle possible for Mr Richards to bring a restitutionary claim? (ii) If so, can the present claim be pursued otherwise than by way of judicial review?"

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 28/7/16🔍

Court: High Court (Chancery Division)🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

  • Richards (Kenneth John)🔍
  • Worcestershire County Council🔍
  • South Worcestershire Clinical Commissioning Group🔍

Judicial history:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 12/10/16 22:36

Cached: 2020-10-30 18:35:42