Patel v Arriva Midlands Ltd [2019] EWHC 1216 (QB)

Capacity and ability to communicate "Dr Fleminger's assessment was: 'Whether or not he can understand what information he is given and use and weigh this information in the balance to make decision, he is unable to communicate any decision he has made. Whether or not he regains capacity in the future depends on the outcome of his conversion disorder'. I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that Dr Fleminger's capacity assessment was made on the basis of incorrect information gleaned from the Claimant's presentation and from what he was told by Chirag Patel of the Claimant's disabilities, namely that the Claimant was unable to communicate any decision he has made. ... In addition ... I do accept Dr Schady's opinion [that there is no conversion disorder]. Once again that leaves the Claimant with a presumption of capacity. ... To summarise: (i) The Claimant is presumed to have capacity. (ii) The court finds that the Claimant has been fundamentally dishonest in respect of his claim, and his litigation friend Chirag Patel has participated in this dishonesty. (iii) The entirety of the claim is dismissed, the court being satisfied that no substantial injustice would be caused in so doing. The court assesses damages for the 'honest part' of the claim at £5750."

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII!

Subject(s):

  • Other capacity cases🔍

Date: 14/5/19🔍

Court: High Court (Queen's Bench Division)🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

  • Sudhirkumar Patel🔍
  • Arriva Midlands Ltd🔍
  • Zurich Insurance plc🔍

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 15/5/19

Cached: 2019-07-20 07:35:55