University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust v Thirumalesh [2023] EWCOP 43

Discharge of RRO Following the patient's death, her family applied for discharge of a transparency order, and the Trust argued for its continuation for a further 8 weeks. The judge noted that there is little practical difference between transparency orders and reporting restrictions orders (RROs) and uniform terminology would be more desirable.

Essex

This case has been summarised on page 7 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 135A, October 2023).

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

• Reporting restriction order cases🔍 Older RRO cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases

Date: 29/9/23🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judicial history:

• Hemachandran v Thirumalesh [2024] EWCA Civ 896 (appeal)
• University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust v Thirumalesh [2023] EWCOP 43 (discharge of RRO)
• A NHS Trust v ST [2023] EWCOP 40 (belief and capacity)

Judge(s):

• Peel🔍

Parties:

• Sudiksha Thirumalesh🔍
• Thirumalesh Hemachandran🔍
• Revathi Thirumalesh🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2023] EWCOP 43^B

What links here:

• A NHS Trust v ST [2023] EWCOP 40
• 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 135A, October 2023)
• Hemachandran v Thirumalesh [2024] EWCA Civ 896

Published: 10/10/24 11:11

Cached: 2024-11-23 11:59:12