Re S; D v R (the deputy of S) [2010] EWHC 3748 (COP)

Revision as of 22:10, 16 October 2011 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Costs judgment in Court of Protection: (1) up to the December 2009 hearing, because the proceedings had been necessary, the normal rule that costs were to be paid by S's estate...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Costs judgment in Court of Protection: (1) up to the December 2009 hearing, because the proceedings had been necessary, the normal rule that costs were to be paid by S's estate was to apply, but (2) from that point onwards, because of her conduct of proceedings, Mrs D was to bear her own costs, plus 75% of the Deputy's costs on the standard (not indemnity) basis.

Related judgments

Sharma v Hunters [2011] EWHC 2546 (COP)

External link

...