R v Charisma [2009] EWCA Crim 2345

Revision as of 21:23, 26 May 2015 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The appellant argued that his mental condition had made it undesirable for him to have given evidence, so no direction under s35 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (adverse inference from failure to give evidence) should have been given; he was unsuccessful.

External link

Bailii