Dunhill v Burgin [2012] EWCA Civ 397, [2012] MHLO 33

Revision as of 02:10, 28 August 2019 by Jonathan (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(1) In deciding whether the claimant had capacity to settle a claim for £12,500 (at hearing it would have been worth at least £800,000) the question was not whether she had capacity to enter into that settlement but whether she had capacity to litigate. (2) On the facts, she had lacked capacity, and the compromise would never have been approved by the court.

Related judgments

External links

BAILII!

Supreme Court - permission granted on 23/10/12