Panteleyenko v Ukraine 11901/02 [2006] ECHR 667
A search of the applicant's office, and the disclosure of confidential psychiatric information, was not in accordance with domestic law and therefore violated Article 8; the domestic authorities' refusal to pay compensation on the ground that criminal proceedings had been discontinued on "non-exonerating grounds" contravened the presumption of innocence and violated Article 6(2).
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: